Owner identity
Has the person listing the property shown an identity document or other agreed proof?
Platform checkTrust, in separate steps
A property can have its owner identity checked without its land records being confirmed. The platform should show those differences clearly.
The verification model
The first pilot can begin with the platform checks. Government checks require written authorization and an agreed process.
Has the person listing the property shown an identity document or other agreed proof?
Platform checkHas the property been physically seen by the owner, team, or approved checker?
Physical checkHas the checker recorded the land document, claimant, Alkalo or local representative, and consented visit video?
Evidence packetHas someone confirmed that the property is still available on a stated date?
Fresh informationHas the relevant authority checked the land or property records?
Government onlyHas an authorized government body issued a confirmation that can be cited?
Not connectedNew platform requirement
The checker keeps the original document copy, a short video of the claimant, Alkalo or appropriate local representative, and checker, plus the date, location, listing ID, and written visit report. This creates an evidence trail if the same parcel or document later appears for someone else. It does not replace official land records or prove ownership by itself.
What we can build now
We can design the record, permissions, document checklist, audit trail, and status language now. The official connection can be switched on only after the right institution agrees to the process.
Open demo verification deskUntil then, the site must never say “Government Approved.”
Build trust carefully
That honesty is part of the product—not a weakness in the product.